Buy:Zithromax.Levitra.Viagra.Cialis.Maxaman.Soma.Super Active ED Pack.Viagra Professional.Propecia.Viagra Super Active+.Cialis Soft Tabs.VPXL.Viagra Soft Tabs.Cialis Professional.Tramadol.Cialis Super Active+.Viagra Super Force….

Based on nibbler algorithm, should we have a meta description tags for a tags or categories archive pages?

As for Analytics, that’s more complex. The test itself has value, i.e. it is useful to know that visible Analytics is being used or not (especially as Javascript-based analytics is required for some types of user behaviour analysis, that weblog analysis isn’t capable of). For most casual users, for instance, not making use of say Google Analytics is a rookie mistake. For most of our corporate clients, omitting Analytics means someone isn’t doing their job properly.

However, that’s not the contentious part. The issue here is your numeric summary score is being affected by what that test reports, i.e. you’re being penalised for something you argue isn’t relevant.

It depends in part what meaning you give to the overall score. For Nibbler, we have a pretty basic summary system – anything we test is simply either ‘good’ or ‘bad’, so there’s not much room for context. Future versions will be more like SiteRay, with tests affecting specific summary criteria (e.g. ‘marketing’ or ‘accessibility’) differently. In this case, the Analytics test would probably affect your ‘Marketing’ score, but your overall score would be comparatively unaffected.

Also – we can’t do this for Nibbler, but in SiteRay we might ask users whether they have a good reason for ignoring Analytics, or using their own proprietary solution (e.g. like Facebook and Google do). If we did this for Nibbler you’d have no consistency in scoring.

I hope this makes some sense, thanks for the feedback.

There are also various other things lowering the score. E.g., if a site uses no Nibbler-visible analytics tool, don’t penalize it. Not to mention that many users see tracking tools like Google Analytics as a *bad* thing, so the report should probably reflect it *that* way.

Fix things like this, please, or your service can’t be taken serious.

Then what is the IP it’s crawling from. I will need to enable that because my site blocks anything that looks like a proxy.

We are using “Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3″

If you check that later I’m sure someone will answer it for you!